Within the Plantation Household Black and White Women of the Old South Review
BOOK REVIEWS349 onstrating that sound scholarly research tin also be "a skillful read," professional person and apprentice historians and the general reading public are very much in the author's debt. Davtd Due east. Meerse New York City Inside the Plantation Household: Black and White Women of the Old South. By Elizabeth Fox-Genovese. (Chapel Colina and London: The University of North Carolina Press, 1988. Pp. twenty, 544. $34.95.) At that place are a practiced many ways to approach historical problems concerning gender. This one focuses more systematically and with greater clarity than most. It locates two groups of women in a specific social setting and compels us to think about how they maneuvered—how they shaped and were shaped past—rigid lines of both race and class, primarily during the final forty years of the existence of chattel slavery in the United States. The author uses the term household in a style that is crucial to her entire word. Equally distinguished from a home, a family, or a statistical entity, the household is treated as "a basic social unit of measurement in which people, whether voluntarily or under compulsion, pool their income and resources " (31). For Southern women, much more than than Southern men, this unit was in fact the social world in which they had to operate. As much as slaveholding women were able to enlarge their mental worlds by reading, they were hemmed into the realm of the household. For them, principal social contacts came at the borders when their own household met with others. Slave women were even more circumscribed, though the author is careful to point out exceptional instances where blackness women successfully bankrupt down the advisedly constructed fencing. Fifty-fifty a large-scale study such as this one is itself fenced in by the skewed nature of the written sources produced by the particular social club in question. The writer is forced to rely very heavily on diaries created by slaveholding women and on the written results of latter-day interviews (as well as a few autobiographies) with former slaves. Her focus of study virtually precludes reliance on such traditional sources for the report of slavery equally travelers' accounts and essays "on the management of negroes ." Both these latter groups of sources would have only confirmed the obvious fact—which the author emphasizes in more compelling ways—that the social organization was dominated by men, and that women knew this and, to a big extent, had to ascertain their ain gender inside and fifty-fifty past the bonds of this dominance. Focusing on the household results in important insights. The author makes evidently the contrast between the confining world of slaveholding women and that of white women of the North and western Europe, 350CIVIL War HISTORY where the triumph of bourgeois capitalist individualism was having interesting effects on what women were thinking, doing, and beingness immune to say. This focus also tends to emphasize the interaction between black and white women as they both found their own definitions of gender shaped by the divisions of class and race. Thus, the author does not greatly emphasize the office of slave women within their own community. Her portrait is less full and detailed for black women than white, if but considering for compelling reasons, slave women were not much in the habit of keeping diaries. Obviously, the author's focus does non let soapbox on Southern white women who did not own slaves. The sources themselves drive anyone toward the larger farming units of the Due south. The complexity and subtlety of the author's analysis is such that any summary here necessarily results in oversimplification. Among her more striking emphases is the reluctant conclusion that white slaveholding women were, if anything, more racially cynical toward blacks than white men were. She makes a largely convincing case that about slaveholding women did non actually oppose the system of labor from which they so profoundly benefited; on this matter, her discussion of Mary Boykin Chesnut is both sparkling and devastating. In general, she takes the view that the state of war was a major breaking point for slaveholding women of a preponderantly rural society. At one point she makes the intriguing suggestion that "every bit southern society coalesced, slaveholders and...
This website uses cookies to ensure you lot go the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.
Source: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/420824/pdf
0 Response to "Within the Plantation Household Black and White Women of the Old South Review"
Post a Comment